OFIRM follow-up: public manuscript and OSF project recovered
Reviewed 2026-09-05 UTC

Result
The OFIRM V2.0 manuscript is publicly readable on an author-linked Neocities
site. It is a conceptual manuscript, not a recovered xinzhai implementation.
The author-linked OSF project exists and was created before the xz stream.
No xz-specific connection was found in the inspected material.

Recovery and chronology
The Neocities home page links a theory index that links the V2.0 manuscript.
The manuscript displays a completion date of March 14, 2026; that is an author
claim, not an independently verified first-publication time. It discusses a
proposed consciousness/AGI architecture, memory and feedback; it does not
establish the scientific claims it makes. It was recovered as 191230 bytes of
HTML containing 39413 extracted text characters.
SHA256: 2a7dda42beea5cd00dd37230be5644888c5f71a25e1af5aa368e4add7070ca4b

Home: https://ofirm.neocities.org/
Index: https://ofirm.neocities.org/theory_view.html
Paper: https://ofirm.neocities.org/《OFIRM本源场直觉共振模型之意识起源、演化与硅基实现的统一理论》V2.0%20悲悯版

The linked OSF node 3m4z2 is public and titled AGi / ASi @ OFIRM.
Its authoritative API metadata records creation 2026-03-30T19:46:16.307550 and
modification 2026-05-03T11:36:49.668761. This proves the project existed before
July; it does not date every linked file or authenticate theoretical claims.
The project description positions the author as supplying concepts and asks
engineering teams to implement them, explicitly saying coding is not where
the author wants to focus. This weakens treating the public manuscript as an
already implemented agent runtime. The site's home page separately announces
an April 7 AGIv1.0 release while saying it is not public. These statements are
not proof either of working software or of its absence.
https://api.osf.io/v2/nodes/3m4z2/
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3M4Z2

Technical comparison
Six captured HTML pages were converted to text and checked case-insensitively
for xinzhai, xz_knowledge, improvement_plan, Fernet, AES, 加密, checkpoint,
检查点, 备份, 30000, ubuntu.org.cn, GitHub and Gitee. All markers had zero matches
in each page. Scope: home, theory index, V2.0 manuscript, DOI page, AGI
implementation page and Following God's Way essay. No linked code repository
was identified among those pages' links. This is bounded coverage, not a global
claim that the author has never published code.

https://ofirm.neocities.org/DOI.html
https://ofirm.neocities.org/AGI_Implementation_view.html
https://ofirm.neocities.org/Following_God_view.html

Interpretation
Combined with report 132, this is a verified example of Chinese speculative
AGI writing distributed across Pastebin links, a static site and a public
research repository. It extends the publication/priority explanation for using
public text hosts. It adds no evidence that OFIRM produced the xz ciphertexts.
The manuscript recovered here has not been compared byte-for-byte with the
unavailable Pastebin paper, so they must not be described as identical copies.

The ofirm.org home, DOI and Following_God pages returned 403 on ordinary GETs.
The independently accessible Neocities site supplied its own linked documents;
no authentication, bypass, messages or downloaded code execution was used.
No contact information is reproduced in this public report.

Private captures and retrieval hashes: 134-private/sources.json.
Marker counts and text lengths: 134-private/analysis.json.
Raw pages remain private; no website generator edits made by this review.