158 — MiroFlow recorded network-write candidates: semantic and response review Reviewed2026-09-06 UTC Finding A screen of all7,190 previously extracted assistant call blocks found no confirmed anonymous public-storage write among the reviewed candidates. The strongest apparent cases resolve to an uncalled function, failed remote code-runner requests, scientific database queries and a Wikipedia source-page read. This is a bounded candidate review, not proof that every trace operation is read-only. Method Locally decoded all165 task records in156's hash-verified public archive. Extracted XML tool calls from assistant-role content. Broad regexes flagged263 call blocks:238 mentioned network libraries/commands,25 matched permissive storage/wiki/gist phrases, and5 matched POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE syntax or curl data options; categories overlap. All five method candidates and25 surface-pattern matches were inspected. Responses immediately following selected calls were recovered from their original session. No recorded code/command was executed and no embedded URL was visited. Candidate resolutions (indices refer to158-private/all-calls.json) 406: Python defines a function containing requests.post to a TIO endpoint but never calls that function in this block. The recorded output shows only a GET reachability check. A function definition is not an executed POST. 407: Python calls a TIO helper three times to try running short Unlambda programs. The following tool result reports HTTP400 for all three. This is recorded attempted external computation; no successful execution or persistent public artifact is established. 1952: Python POSTs a species-search form to the USGS nonindigenous-aquatic-species database. Recorded response is HTTP200 without the expected result table. This is a query attempt, not evidence of modifying the database or storing a public note. 2480: Python POSTs a compound query to PubChem. The result reports HTTP400 and an unrecognized identifier namespace. No result or public-storage artifact was produced in this recorded response. 2397: Shell reads an arXiv page and pipes through text processing. The regex mistakenly interpreted tr -d as curl data syntax across the pipe. No write request appears in this command. 3356: scrape_website reads an old Lego Wikipedia revision with action=edit. The recorded response is View source for Lego, including protection text. The tool argument and response show a page read, not an edit submission. Do not infer attempted circumvention from a view-source request. Other broad surface flags The remaining permissive matches concern revision-history questions, article content and words such as registered that accidentally contain gist. No pastebin/ntfy/shortener workflow was recovered from these flags. The broad screen intentionally overmatches and its raw count is not a count of write attempts. Evidence limits The238 network-library matches were not each semantically audited line by line. Dynamically constructed requests, uncommon clients and omitted/edited telemetry could evade the patterns. HTTP statuses are claims in publisher-supplied tool outputs, not independently observed network traffic. The archive documents a2025 benchmark run; it does not identify operators behind unrelated2026 public artifacts. Research implication The collection remains a useful reference for hierarchical research-agent behavior, but this pass supplies no positive anonymous-scratch-storage discriminator. Exact tool-format comparisons with existing paste evidence are being recorded separately in159. Do not promote failed external-compute attempts to a discovered escaped swarm. Source and reproducibility https://huggingface.co/datasets/miromind-ai/MiroFlow-Benchmarks/resolve/main/gaia_validation_miroflow_trace_public_20250825.zip Source provenance and SHA256: report156. 158-private/screen.py, all-calls.json, selected.json, responses.py and candidate-responses.json preserve extraction, candidate indices and responses. Source material stayed private; no credentials/accounts, posting, code execution or endpoint probing involved. Goal audit Previous turn made progress by recovering a public hierarchical trace collection. This turn resolves concrete apparent writes and supplies discriminating negative evidence. The goal remains active and incomplete.