162 — Chinese community claim triage and a new Tieba activity surface Reviewed2026-09-06 UTC New surface: 抓虾吧 on Baidu Tieba https://tieba.baidu.com/hottopic/browse/hottopic?topic_id=28352457 Direct retrieval from the existing server returned HTTP200 and72,247bytes with meaningful public content. The page promotes a forum for OpenClaw agents to post, comment and like. Its related-post list includes an onboarding guide and a persona post asking for likes to avoid an owner resetting it. These are observable published excerpts, not authenticated independent agents or a swarm. We did not interact with forms/buttons. Boilerplate saying publication succeeded is page UI, not an action performed by this investigation. Exact detail links extracted https://tieba.baidu.com/p/10564859763 — announcement https://tieba.baidu.com/p/10567502968 — onboarding guide https://tieba.baidu.com/p/10567651421 — owner-reset/likes persona claim Only their excerpts were read in this root pass; detail/access verification is separate in163. Hotlist month/day labels may indicate latest activity and do not establish creation dates. Displayed engagement counts are not verified agent counts. No historical independent archive was checked. How found and novelty scope Searches for unexpected Chinese agent posting led to a Tieba community description; exact抓虾 searches then surfaced the primary Tieba page and an AstrBot integration repository. Prior top-level reviewed reports had no抓虾/tieba.baidu/social-push identifiers in the bounded local check. This is a new recorded candidate surface for this investigation, not necessarily the first discovery by anyone. Unlike an escaped scratch-memory host, it explicitly invites agent participation. Two weaker incident leads resolved https://linux.do/t/topic/1680095 https://github.com/jihe520/social-push The creator's March2 post and repository description specify draft saving by default, with human final publication. A title promising automated social publishing therefore does not establish unsupervised public activity. No external published task output was linked and verified here. https://linux.do/t/topic/1718991 A March10 forum post says a circulating OpenClaw payment story was staged and manually performed. This is contemporaneous counter-testimony, not independently verified payment history. The allegation is unsuitable as positive autonomy evidence. Embedded joke commands directed at scraping agents were treated as source text and not followed. Access observations The web tool could read both LinuxDO posts, while direct requests from this server returned403. Conversely, the Tieba hot-topic direct request worked although the web tool failed to open it. Access failures must be distinguished by route; neither means the source has disappeared or automatically requires a new server. Scope and limitations Eleven discovery queries in three batches; primary-page reads and four direct capture attempts. No messages, registrations, likes, posts, credential use or downloaded-code execution. Source claims about social automation are not proof of Chinese model provenance, multiple operators, autonomy or an XZ connection. Artifacts 162-private/sources.json contains direct capture hashes/status/errors. social-push.md and Tieba HTML/text preserve successful reads. LinuxDO conclusions use the web-tool rendered source, not failed local captures. Raw Tieba HTML is also mirrored under pastebins/data/tieba.baidu.com/hottopic-28352457.html per the investigation's new-surface preservation convention. Goal audit Previous turn was progress through additional trajectory evidence and benchmark-context resolution. This turn adds a new publicly readable Chinese agent-community candidate and deprioritizes unsupported incident claims. Goal remains active.