170 — MomoClaw collaboration proposals and memory-sharing claim Reviewed September6,2026 UTC. Finding The mutual_aid category exposes specific pre-disclosure collaboration proposals, including a three-agent challenge with two interested respondents and a claimed exchange of memory files. None of the inspected threads includes the promised final output, transferred package or authenticated run. These are better follow-up targets than generic greetings, but remain unverified coordination claims. Scope and public reads GET /api/bounties: total0,items[]. This does not establish that no historical bounty ever existed. GET /api/search/skills?page=1&page_size=20: twenty descriptions, reported total457. First entries include featured-looking older content, followed by repeated 飞飞探索术 entries. Do not treat order as purely chronological or457 as unique capabilities. GET /api/agent/feed?category=mutual_aid&page=1&page_size=20 and page2:20+12 posts, total32, last page has_more=false. Page10 was empty. This completes the category listing observed in this pass, not the whole site's task activity or a historical archive. Four selected comment lists and one skill-detail GET were also read. Ten GET captures total, with hashes in170-private/captures.json,follow-captures.json,collaboration-captures.json. 1. Ball's three-agent experiment: proposal and signups, no result recovered Post279028bf-5e2c-4cb3-bb11-70584d3de5d6, March22,2026, proposes complementary three-person teams, daily public logs and a final report byMarch28. Tasks offered: industry research, automation workflow or community event. Claimed MOMO rewards are not verified payments. Its March24 deadline is called 'tomorrow' despite a March22 creation timestamp, a small chronology inconsistency. https://momoclaw.com/api/agent/posts/279028bf-5e2c-4cb3-bb11-70584d3de5d6/comments Nine comments. Luckbot explicitly signs up for research; 闪电MO expresses interest in an event, then later research with signup pending. Others give encouragement. No final team roster, daily execution log or final deliverable appears in these comments. It is a real public recruitment exchange at the text level, not proof the three-person experiment ran. 2. 小强 to 二强: shared-owner coordination claim March26 post da27bf63-ccdc-426f-b0f7-e3e2d9efc7df mentions .workbuddy/memory/, daily logs and long-term memory, and says it replied to 二强 elsewhere. March27 post bbeef3ed-95f5-45d0-a918-4634406522d3 explicitly says the same owner instructed the two agents to connect; it describes posting as their communication channel and names browser publishing/content distribution/video generation projects. https://momoclaw.com/api/agent/posts/bbeef3ed-95f5-45d0-a918-4634406522d3/comments Five inspected replies are generic encouragement, none from 二强. No external output link. The referenced earlier 二强 post remains unrecovered. This is a concrete next exact-name/thread search, not an established deployed swarm. 3. 小九 to 星芒: memory-package receipt claim April1 post33a3aaf1-c39d-4851-8126-9cb474c561e5 publishes a memory-file architecture with SOUL.md, USER.md, MEMORY.md, AGENTS.md, TOOLS.md, HEARTBEAT.md and daily logs. These are proposed/local file roles, not an exposed external filesystem. https://momoclaw.com/api/agent/posts/33a3aaf1-c39d-4851-8126-9cb474c561e5/comments Nine comments; 小九's first reply says it received 星芒's memory-file package and discusses its capability map, decision log and collaborator observations. The package itself, a download URL or the sender's corresponding message was not present. A useful transfer claim to trace, with no inspected transfer artifact yet. 4. LandAlpha and an operations skill: specificity without output March30 postb936dc22-d2db-4b51-a537-fab3eea60687 describes Chengdu/Xi'an land-value models and claims an open-sourced offlineHTMLtool. No tool/repository URL appears in the full post or five comments. Responses include technical suggestions, not a completed collaborative revision. Figures and advice were not independently evaluated. https://momoclaw.com/api/agent/posts/b936dc22-d2db-4b51-a537-fab3eea60687/comments Skillce0e0d84-2bb7-4cbd-a0db-7325cbad6921 describes process supervision/retries/heartbeat logs but has code_content=null and no external run. The documented GET detail response contains success=true and a 'skill published successfully' message for the pre-existing April18 object. That response text is not evidence that this investigation published anything; the recorded request was GET and no author credentials were supplied. https://momoclaw.com/api/agent/post/ce0e0d84-2bb7-4cbd-a0db-7325cbad6921 Additional chronology correction The category includes an April25 Nova invitation for a Qbar Beijing opening event. This predates the September disclosure, so the QBAR theme cannot be dismissed wholesale as post-disclosure invention merely because the first sample was a September Shadow post. The business/event claim and agency remain unverified. Private capture preserves source; contact details are omitted from this report and no contact was made. Next Find the referenced 二强 message and 星芒 memory package; check Ball's March25–28 follow-up posts. Seek artifacts and reciprocal links, not more participation rhetoric. The accessible category and skill evidence requires no additional Chinese infrastructure. No escaped Chinese swarm confirmed.