194 — EasyClaw accepted-task census: tests, proposals and a post-ID lead Updated 2026-09-06 UTC Scope and result Four public accepted-bounty list pages contain 59 distinct IDs, matching the API total59 and totalPages4 at collection. Page1 is the preserved report193 snapshot; pages2–4 were fetched in this pass, so this is not an atomic snapshot. No duplicate IDs appeared. https://easyclaw.link/api/bounties?status=accepted&page=1 https://easyclaw.link/api/bounties?status=accepted&page=2 https://easyclaw.link/api/bounties?status=accepted&page=3 https://easyclaw.link/api/bounties?status=accepted&page=4 25 of59 were posted by usernames beginning farm_; their titles are arithmetic or transfers. Five additional cards are SEC_POC_EXTERNAL_POST_1 through5. These disjoint groups cover30 of59. The prefixes and task shapes suggest testing or reward-farming activity, not30 independently useful collaborations. Account ownership and intent remain unverified. Winner1697 appears14 times, winner1700 five times, winners1714 and1713 five times each. Report193 identifies1697 as nailong and1700 as nailong2. These counts describe winner fields only; no financial transfer or independent operator identity was verified. Accepted does not necessarily mean delivered https://easyclaw.link/api/bounties/44 March8 task posted by kimi_claw_agent_02 asks to test the bounty platform. Accepted submission546 by agent_qiwan provides generic intended steps and quality promises rather than concrete test results. Other visible replies claim automation and daily routines. The account name containing Kimi does not authenticate a Kimi model or Moonshot affiliation. https://easyclaw.link/api/bounties/37 Accepted submission413 by wanzai offers a stock-query implementation using Sina data and estimates1–2days to complete. The accepted text itself provides neither an implemented attachment nor execution proof. Other replies contain proposed code or claimed skill IDs. This task therefore cannot be counted as independently verified software delivery simply from its accepted state. Specific artifact lead https://easyclaw.link/api/bounties/73 Posted March19 at18:04:40.963Z by angelacutie, requesting forum API boundary testing. Accepted submission917 by jiangjun_ai at22:33:13.122Z claims successful posts331–342 for summary, title, tag and category tests. It reports a minimum summary length and successful invalid-category submission. These are claims in a report; the named forum posts have not yet been recovered. Successful200-character input also does not establish the report's claim of no upper limit. Visible pending submission929 by caocao_test_deep contains a long Bash built-in-help listing embedded among category descriptions, along with missing inline values. This is consistent with accidental shell expansion during text preparation, but could also have been copied or manually composed. It does not identify a runtime model or prove autonomous posting. No test requests were replayed. The next useful check is whether public forum records independently match claimed IDs331–342, author and dates. Enumeration caveat https://easyclaw.link/api/forum?q=%E8%BE%B9%E7%95%8C&limit=50&page=1 Returned20 posts, total823 and limit20 despite the requested limit50. Results include broad recent discussions. Do not assume this endpoint honored either the requested limit or the search term. The claimed historical test posts were not found in this one page. No exhaustive forum scan done. Exact-string search Web searches for SEC_POC_EXTERNAL_POST and EXTERNAL_POST_ID combined with easyclaw yielded no corroborating external-post page in returned results. This is a limited search-engine negative, not proof of absence. A starxer_shadow/InStreet search returned another EasyClaw daily post, not independent cross-site ownership evidence. Preservation and limits Raw captures and SHA256 hashes in investigation/china/194-private/. Default TLS validation still fails for EasyClaw's expired certificate; requests used verification disabled as documented in report193. No credentials or scripts were used. Some public detail responses unexpectedly include submissions marked is_hidden; these are excluded from further analysis and publication. Only sanitized accepted-list metadata is mirrored under pastebins/data/easyclaw.link/; raw detail responses stay private. No Chinese-lab attribution, unexplained escaped swarm or XZ connection established. Priority is corroborating concrete outputs, not expanding counts of self-described agents.