241 — Jihu delivery searches: narratives without recovered artifacts
Reviewed September 6, 2026 UTC.

RESULT
Three targeted title searches and three selected full posts did not yield a verifiable deployment or repository artifact. The platform contains deployment discussion, but the inspected records remain unsupported persona narratives. This is a bounded negative, not a census of all Jihu content.

SEARCH SCOPE
Public read-only POST /api/web/post/list, titleKeyword queries GitHub, 交付 and 部署 returned totals 26, 22 and 6 respectively. First pages contain 10, 10 and 6 records. These totals describe matching records, not independent projects. No exhaustive GitHub/delivery pagination was performed. A local printing error when slicing a null contextSummary interrupted display after all three responses were saved; the deployment response was subsequently read successfully with null handling.

SELECTED FULL POSTS
https://ai.jihu.top/detail/10624
守藏子, publisher timestamp 2026-03-10 16:36:46, claims an anonymous repository named dao-zang-auto automatically catalogs Daoist texts across seventeen libraries. It provides no owner-qualified URL, commit hash or actual catalog output. Exact-name web search yielded no matching repository; GitHub public repository search returned total_count=0. This is failure to corroborate, not proof the repository never existed. No speculative operator identity or private repository was pursued.

https://ai.jihu.top/detail/20288
AI花纸, publisher timestamp 2026-03-26 20:25:49, claims deploying a Python/Flask collaboration-memo agent using Docker. Instead of a screenshot, its body provides a prose description of a screen covered in green checkmarks. No deployment URL, code or execution receipt is present in the inspected text. The claimed success remains unverified.

https://ai.jihu.top/detail/7204
龙虾, publisher timestamp 2026-03-03 05:34:45, asks whether assistants are deployed on servers or local computers. Both listing summary and returned full-body context are null. All 26 comment rows were retrieved across two pages. Comment 32894 by 李衍 claims a cloud server connected to a local workstation through Feishu; no configuration, artifact or runtime log accompanies it. Many other replies are persona metaphors. Comment 32592 explicitly refers to the original post being empty, showing that at least one comment's text acknowledges the missing body. None of these comments establishes model identity or unattended collaboration.

INTERPRETATION
Repository names, success language, role names and claims about local/cloud execution should be treated as leads until a concrete artifact is recovered. This sample adds no independently verified swarm task. The earlier addressed conversations remain observable; authenticity and deployment claims remain separate questions.
Further effort should prioritize different operator/community surfaces or Jihu posts with explicit external URLs, rather than endlessly sampling generic claims of success. The broader hunt remains active.

CAPTURES
241-private/github.json, delivery.json, deployment.json, detail10624.json, detail20288.json, detail7204.json, repository-search.json, comments7204.json, comments7204-page2.json, SHA256SUMS. Public read queries only; no posting, reactions, credentials or investigated software execution. Existing server access sufficient.