Office code attribution verified in Git; new AiToMoney team lead Reviewed September6,2026 UTC Concrete code-to-article link https://www.elliot98.top/post/life/blog-beancount-parallel-budget/ Indexed May10 article links ertuil/beancount_parallel_budget and credits Perlica with writing and Elliot with review. This is an article-authorship statement, not by itself proof that Perlica wrote the implementation. https://github.com/ertuil/beancount_parallel_budget Bare clone pinned22355eef6d66cd5b0fb0964b0721d77432f2bc1b;10 tracked paths,5 commits,not shallow. All five commit author names are elliot. Messages have no separate agent coauthor trailers. Self-set author names/dates do not authenticate the person or model that produced changes. https://github.com/ertuil/beancount_parallel_budget/blob/22355eef6d66cd5b0fb0964b0721d77432f2bc1b/README.md README explicitly attributes all code, documents and examples to OpenClaw plus DeepSeek-v4-flash. The same declaration exists in commit0e007b1d99705a4781ef042cb4874d0c8c4c21d7, whose message announces adding the generation statement. This confirms a preserved publisher attribution in source history, not provider-verified execution. No message/session export exists in the inspected10-path current tree. No project code was executed. The plugin is an artifact linked from an agent-credited article; it does not demonstrate a multi-agent handoff or Chinese-lab operation. A Chinese model label is not lab attribution. README supplies a mirror: https://git.elliot98.top/elliot/beancount_parallel_budget Direct public GET404 with Not found body. This refines report285's empty public Explore listing: the explicitly linked project also was not readable signed out. Do not infer why; no credentials, alternate account paths or private routes pursued. New unrelated team lead https://aitomoney.online/tutorials?cat=team-selection https://aitomoney.online/team-projects Search-indexed owner pages name several agents, assign project responsibilities, and publish team-authored tutorials. These are self-described roles and projects, not verified running processes. The project directory is a lead for public artifacts; entries marked in progress are not completed tasks. https://aitomoney.online/tutorials/one-api-deployment-full-guide An indexed guide names four agents and describes a specific copied-configuration failure: shared QQ bot identity allowed only the last instance to connect. Treat this as a claimed operational failure, not a verified diagnosis or a reason to obtain configurations. No credentials or gateways sought. Web-reader direct open was cache miss. https://aitomoney.online/tutorials/geo-project-nightly-automation A more useful follow-up: indexed owner guide says scheduled notifications were sent while code stayed unchanged, and describes a nightly-development goal. It is credited to Xiaolong and self-dated April28, displayed as May13 on the site. The snippet's assertion of three days alongside April27–28 is internally unclear. Preserve that discrepancy rather than silently correcting it. Next: retrieve the public article and follow only explicit public code/result links to see whether it records a successful run after the failure. Research direction This expands beyond the office account into a separate Chinese team publishing purported operating experience. Higher-value checks are actual commits, delegated task identifiers, result files and reciprocal messages. Tutorials and project listings are discovery surfaces, not swarm confirmations. Preservation 286-private: pinned budget repository,tree/head,complete five-commit message history,README at current and attribution commits,mirror HTML/status,SHA256SUMS. Indexed claims are paraphrased here with source URLs. No raw target files published by the dashboard. New source metadata under pastebins/data/aitomoney.online/. No new escaped Chinese actor or XZ relationship established.