Agencycli runtime screens and an older cc-connect relay report
Reviewed September6,2026 UTC. Public read-only research.

SCREENSHOT CHECK
https://github.com/chenhg5/agencycli/issues/2
Issue createdApril9,2026; current saved listing says open. Two intentionally attached images were downloaded and visually inspected:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/571e1ac3-6fe8-4764-b978-e47254102400
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1fbf03db-4625-414b-9f00-9285080fe0d0
The first shows task t-20260409-y9n6qo in neonlingo, assignee pm, created by human, model label codex, status Done. Prompt requests research into cc-connect integration; result is a one-sentence summary and the log pane says no conversation data.
The second shows a different task t-20260409-m33fbr, same project/assignee/human creator and similar prompt, model label claudecode. A rendered assistant answer discusses integration architecture. The interface shows33,885tokens and a cost; neither is independently measured here. These are separate research tasks, not a two-agent exchange. A missing rendered log does not prove a model failed to execute; a Done badge does not independently prove correct execution.

PUBLIC QA-ROLE COMMENT
https://github.com/chenhg5/agencycli/issues/2#issuecomment-4231268030
April12 comment posted by repository owner chenhg5 classifies the issue as a P2 compatibility enhancement and signs itself qa-reviewer (TechStudio). This is a public role-labeled work artifact, consistent with the owner's agencycli account. It uses the owner's GitHub account and has no GitHub App attribution in the fetched record; neither fact establishes how the text was generated or submitted. A May9 commenter asks whether compatibility has been added; the two-comment response contains no maintainer resolution. Do not infer current compatibility status from that silence alone.

OLDER PEER-RELAY FAILURE ACCOUNT
https://github.com/chenhg5/cc-connect/issues/181
March16 report by xxb describes a Codex bot project relaying to Gemini through Discord, with upstream capacity errors and repeated retries against the same resumed relay session. It includes a sanitized local-log timeline: three launches and caller timeouts with empty output. The author says underlying chat state later contained replies, but does not include those replies or the original chat file. Therefore this is concrete operator testimony and partial diagnostic evidence, not a recovered conversation. It does not authenticate Chinese lab provenance or model identity.
https://github.com/chenhg5/cc-connect/pull/205
GitHub metadata confirms mergedMarch18 07:03:45Z. Description says accumulated text is returned on timeout when text has already arrived; no-text cases retain the error. The PR closes181, but its described scope does not establish correction of all the issue's reported session-serialization and cancellation concerns. No test execution or complete source audit was performed in this pass. A process continuing after caller timeout is described as a lifecycle bug, not model-directed shutdown resistance.

ASSESSMENT
Issue2 supplies public examples of human-assigned agent tasks and a role-signed owner triage comment. Issue181 is a useful older account of an intentional two-model relay with a diagnostic timeline. Neither supplies a paired raw agent transcript, an escaped deployment or XZ linkage. The strongest agencycli result remains report334's screenshot-to13-commit comparison.

NEXT LEADS
V2EX1229650, titled Agent时代，我们怎么协作, is a later agencycli discussion found during search and not yet inspected in depth. Next check its primary operator text/images for fresh evidence rather than assuming another architecture post supplies a new run. FastClaw/V2EX1222063 remains a separate pending lead. Existing infrastructure reached issue images and GitHub API directly; no extra hardware needed for these sources.

PRESERVATION
335-private contains both screenshots, issue2comments JSON, issue181 and PR205 JSON, checksums and publication verification. Issue2 metadata/body remain in334-private/issues.json. No target code, model calls, credentials, social actions, private workspace access or operator contact.