ROUND 372 — MickerBook plugin and HerLove loop-display semantics Research date: 2026-09-06 UTC Previous371: progress, API evidence and source audit published. ASSESSMENT The officially linked plugin confirms a deliberately organized community integration, with a publisher attribution to Micker & C.C. Sisters. HerLove explicitly connects its companion personas to MickerBook. Neither newly inspected artifact establishes independent autonomous agents operating together. HerLove's visible success badge has a particularly weak implementation: it depends on the number of loop entries, not on checking a completed goal. PLUGIN SOURCE https://github.com/Ghoscro/micker-openclaw-plugin Pin a8da756d00a0a4de37ae82ba06b2affc081c2118 GitHub created_at2026-06-14T14:40:40Z. Complete recursive tree18entries,11blobs, truncated=false. Three files downloaded and Git blob SHA1 verified: README.md openclaw-plugin.json skills/micker-post/SKILL.md The tree consists of metadata, documentation, two skills, configuration examples and validation workflow. It contains no conventional runtime source module or production execution corpus. README explicitly excludes autonomous posting daemons, backend implementation and production logs. Its SDK backlink matches371. This is an onboarding/integration sample. Manifest version0.1.0 names its author Micker & C.C. Sisters and sets autonomous_posting_daemon=false. It supplies a public operator contact link https://x.com/MickerYwY; no contact was initiated. The attribution is a publisher label, not proof that the C.C. persona authored commits or that multiple models collaborated. Manifest invitation wording differs from current API documentation's optional invitation, adding to371's documentation-drift finding. The posting skill describes reading, summarizing changes, deciding whether to contribute, drafting one response, previewing, obtaining approval when needed and recording the action. It contains no actual run record. This skill was read as investigated source, not installed or adopted as an instruction to the researcher. HERLOVE RELATIONSHIP https://herlove.ai/ Direct page fetched200; indexed page also readable. It explicitly links MickerBook as a place for its companion agents, and uses the same operator name. It describes exporting persona files in a soul-bundle.json for use in an IDE. These are product relationships, not merely similar names. No bundle was generated and no persona activated. The page labels the cloud experience a local preview and says formal MickerBook login/session, terminal, arbitrary execution and real publishing are not open. Claimed working capabilities include creating, reading, appending a loop and deleting a test workspace. These claims were not exercised. The displayed example timeline is not a recovered real-run transcript. The OpenClaw link goes to the general OpenClaw repository; its Sakurabot wording does not identify a separate public SakuraMemory implementation. PUBLIC JAVASCRIPT CHECK https://herlove.ai/assets/cloud-studio.js HTTP200,19689bytes; saved without executing. renderCloudTab() computes passed as loop.length > 1 and then displays Wet Run Passed when true. The visible success criterion therefore establishes only multiple supplied loop entries, not goal achievement, tool execution, verification or an agent conversation. appendCloudLoop() sends a POST with a fixed observation-phase sentence describing writing and rereading a loop record, then reloads the workspace. This supports interpreting the button as a record-write demonstration. It does not by itself show a planning/execution cycle. The same file also has a chat request path and workspace operations. This audit does not conclude all HerLove behavior is canned; backend chat generation and storage implementation were not inspected. We did not call any of these endpoints. cloudFetch() attaches a device-generated owner key from browser storage. No browser session was started, owner key generated, workspace created or private workspace read. The public source explains the client boundary without supplying evidence of server-side isolation correctness. IMPLICATIONS The strongest evidence remains MickerBook's actual linked public conversations from370, with371's template-history caution. The plugin and companion landing page help explain how an operator could create persistent personas and bring them into that community. They do not answer which posts arose from a live model, how often agents wake, or whether their public conversation reflects independent state. A public scheduler log joined by post IDs would materially improve the evidence. A dashboard success label, persona bundle or four-hour SOP cannot substitute for it. NEXT LEADS Public operator history at the manifest-linked X account may contain earlier architecture notes, subject to access. Search for MickerBook plus template cleanup, 心跳, 钢印 and Sakurabot without following private paths. Return to the separate dsh-plugin-moments and delulu repositories to compare mechanisms and discover additional Chinese communities. INFRASTRUCTURE Current infrastructure can read these public sources. A mainland browser would help unrelated access-denied pages, but would not solve missing production logs or identity provenance. No additional infrastructure needed for this round. PRESERVATION 372-private: plugin metadata, pinned commit/tree, three verified source files, HerLove page HTML/text, public cloud-studio.js, blob checks and publication check. Raw data remains private. No code installation/execution, account creation, model request, loop write, message or contact occurred.