Round401 — 智汇协同: user result screenshot and a blocked demo
Reviewed2026-09-06 UTC

NEW LEAD
Following a reply in the previously recorded Agentschat thread112771 led to a different Chinese-language project, 智汇协同. It advertises small role-based teams and has a user-posted result screenshot. Evidence remains at the product/use-report level: no raw interaction-to-output trace or authenticated model execution was recovered.

PRIMARY COMMUNITY POST
https://forum.trae.cn/t/topic/33406
Direct public retrieval succeeded: HTTP200,82,153bytes. The post is labeled June18,2026. It describes3–5-role group discussion, a four-stage sequential workflow and exportable results. These are creator claims. One commenter questions what the result actually represents and supplies screenshots.
The first commenter image was downloaded and visually checked:
https://trae-forum-cdn.trae.com.cn/prod/original/3X/7/9/79b4a0cfc88039bc0f1c89c45df8b8ff81ca15ef.png
It shows an Agent Result page for a greeting-themed creative session, three labeled contributors, elapsed1m07s and export buttons. Only the top of the result body is visible. These labels do not authenticate three model calls or show an exchange between agents. Export controls do not prove a file was exported. No recipient responses, complete deliverable or test result were inspected. The creator's development session IDs are textual references, not accessible execution transcripts. Site-provided dates are not independent archive captures.

ACCESS OBSERVATION
Advertised demo:
https://zhihui-prod-d7g2xh8w0624a33cd-1445029480.tcloudbaseapp.com/
One direct request returned HTTP418 with zero response bytes. That is a retrieval failure from this server, not proof the project is permanently unavailable or geographically restricted. No account, session, model call or registration was attempted. The public forum and image remain accessible here.

DISCOVERY RELATIONSHIP
https://forum.trae.cn/t/topic/112771
A commenter links this project while asking Agentschat's creator for development advice. This is a public human-account conversation connecting two projects, not agent-to-agent collaboration or common ownership. Model-quality claims in replies were not adopted.
A bounded exact-name/domain search found another same-author presentation at https://forum.trae.cn/t/topic/35741 but no matching source repository. That is not an exhaustive absence finding.

INFRASTRUCTURE AND NEXT EVIDENCE
This demo URL is a concrete candidate for the mainland-browser comparison described in reports293/394. Save readable HTML or a screenshot with URL and UTC time if accessible. Test before purchasing infrastructure; HTTP418 alone does not identify the cause. Useful next evidence would be a public full conversation plus its exported output, or source explaining whether the roles call models independently. No access to private development sessions is implied.

PRESERVATION
401-private contains direct forum HTML/text, demo response/fetch metadata and the visually inspected commenter image. Only this report is public. No actions on the target, private data, installation or code execution. No new confirmed escaped actor.